Posts Tagged ‘Design Rights’

The Rise of Intellectual Property Disputes

Monday, July 3rd, 2017

The digital arena poses numerous issues for entrepreneurs and protection of their innovations and ideas. Globalisation and the speed that the information is published over the Internet helps to spread ideas worldwide within minutes. However, it also poses a serious threat to the rights of inventors. In the world of social media, we need to be aware that uploading photos, pictures designs, music, or videos, may compromise valuable intellectual property rights. Once they are uploaded, the rights to them are no longer our own. Therefore, not only do large organisations need to protect their intellectual property rights, but business of all sizes must develop such rights, which may be very valuable in years to come and steps to protect those rights should be taken at the earliest opportunity.

By way of an example, James Dyson invented the world’s, first cyclonic vacuum and straight away applied for a patent covering his invention. He then went on to license his invention to Amway, however, the licence was terminated after Amway claimed the vacuum did not work. Amway then started selling the vacuum machine without Mr Dyson’s permission. Mr Dyson sued Amway for patent infringement and breach of confidence. The damages awarded allowed him to set up his own company producing the first Dyson branded vacuum cleaners. Thus, if it were not for his IP protection through registration, Amway would have gone on to dominate the vacuum machine market without any substantive financial benefit to Mr Dyson. As it currently stands, James Dyson’s invention led him to the Dyson company which is today worth over £7.8 billion.

Here at Bloomsbury Law, our team have years of experience helping clients protect, manage, exploit, enforce and defend their intellectual property rights. We always take current industry trends into consideration and advise our clients accordingly. Our experience covers the entire spectrum of intellectual property law and practice and include the following:

  • Anti-counterfeiting – which prevents your competitors from imitating your brands, products and designs.
  • Copyright and database rights – our experts can help across a range of areas, including disputes and litigation, commercial transactions, general clearance and advisory work, intellectual property rights audits and chain of title research.
  • Design rights – helping you to protect your creative investment and negotiate the complex legal maze.
  • Know how, trade secrets and confidential information – through commercial agreements and litigation measures we can help you protect and exploit these valuable assets.
  • Patent litigation – from multi-million pound patent claims in the High Court to more modest, but vital patent claims in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, our team has the skills and experience to manage all forms of patent litigation.
  • Trademarks and brands – we can advise you across the whole spectrum of trade mark rights and related rights (such as passing off), including: clearance searches, protection and registerability issues, co-ordination and management of trade mark filings, branding and franchise agreements, disputes and litigation.
  • Domain name law – our lawyers have successfully acted both for those bringing and defending domain name proceedings.

Bloomsbury Law has extensive experience in dealing with all kinds of intellectual property disputes; using all forms of dispute resolution and arbitration both nationally and internationally.

Examples of IP disputes the team have dealt with include:

  • Acting and advising numerous branded soft drinks companies to pursue claims against copied versions.
  • Acting for a well-known film producer in defending copyright infringement claim in the High Court.
  • Acting for a well-known greetings card manufacturer against a direct competitor in a claim for copyright infringement of various designs for greeting cards.
  • Advising a company on the suspension of a rival Facebook account that was making unauthorised use of the client’s copyright materials.
  • Advising various clients (particular in the recruitment industry) on breach of confidence, infringement of database rights and breach of restrictive covenant issues relating to ex-employees.

If you would like more information, or you feel that you have a strong claim that you would like to pursue, please get in contact with Jamil Ahmud or Nisha Chopra  on 0207 998 7777.

Intellectual Property

How Will 3D Printing Affect Intellectual Property Rights?

Monday, July 3rd, 2017

There is no doubt that intellectual property right holders and businesses will face disruption as regular people gain access to powerful tools of design and production, away from regulation and control. However, whilst rights owners will be concerned about the challenges 3D printing raises, as is often the case, with new technology and development comes new opportunities.

3D printing technology has been around for a generation, but we are only now reaching the point where private individuals and businesses can buy 3D printers at affordable prices. Consequently, as the availability of 3D printers becomes more widespread and decentralized, questions regarding the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights such as designs, copyright, patents and trademarks, will inevitably arise.

What is 3D printing?

The fundamental concept is that the creation of 3D printed objects is achieved using additive processes, by laying down successive layers of material until the entire object is created. The process begins with making a virtual design of the object you wish to create. This virtual design is then made in a CAD (Computer Aided Design) file using a 3D modeling program for the creation of a new object. Alternatively, to copy an existing object this can be done with the use of a 3D scanner; the scanner makes a 3D digital copy of the object and puts it into a 3D modeling program.

Businesses are also beginning to embrace this new technology. Ryman, the stationery and printing shop now offer 3D printing services, such as the ‘selfie service’ which scans customers and provides them with a mini model of themselves for the price of £50.

Here are the fundamental challenges 3D printing may pose for each particular right, as well as highlighting who may find themselves responsible for infringement:


Patents are monopoly rights granted by the Government to protect inventions. If a patent is granted, the inventor gets a monopoly over use of his/her invention for generally 20 years. In order for an invention to be patentable it must satisfy certain conditions; it must be new, constitute an inventive step and be capable of industrial application and not fall within any of the exclusions set out in the Act.

Who can find themselves responsible for infringement?

Unauthorised commercial production of patented products by 3D printing would constitute an act of patent infringement by the user of the printer. However, it has been highlighted that patentees may be reluctant to sue the end-users of their products, which is something right holders would need to carefully weigh up and consider before starting legal proceedings. There is a statutory exemption for private, non-commercial acts which will apply to patented products that are produced by users at home for personal use. It is important to note that although many patents are for complex inventions, there are some simple patented products which can be produced by 3D printers at home, such as hearing aids.


Copyright protects the physical expression of ideas and arises automatically at the point of creation; there is no need for registration. The downside of such informal creation of copyright in a piece of creative work is that it is very easy for individuals to use elements of other peoples copyright material in creating their own new work without even realising.

Who can find themselves responsible for infringement?

Copyright gives the owner the exclusive right to copy, publish or show their work in public. Thus, if anyone else does any of those things within the UK without permission or a defence, this is likely to be considered infringement. There are two types of infringement; primary and secondary. The primary infringer is liable regardless of his state of mind, whereas the secondary infringer is liable only if knew or had reason to believe he was dealing with an infringing copy.

Design Rights

A registered design is a legal right which protects the overall visual appearance of a product in the geographical area in which it is registered. The visual features that form the design include such things as the lines, contours, colours, shape, texture, materials and the ornamentation of the product which, when applied to the product, give it a unique appearance. A registered design must be ‘new’ and have ‘individual character.’

Who can find themselves responsible for infringement?

Infringement of a registered design occurs where, without permission from the registered proprietor, a product in which the design is incorporated or to which it is applied is made, offered, put on the market, imported, exported or used or where such a product is stocked for those purposes. Thus, commercial reproduction using 3D printers would amount to design right infringement. However, there is an exception to infringement of registered design right for an act which is done privately and for purposes which are not commercial. It is also important to note that knowledge or intention is not required for infringement. The fact the right has been registered gives notice to all, regardless of knowledge.


A trademark is a badge of identification of the trade origin of goods or services from a particular supplier. The trademark can be, for example, words, logos or a combination of both and distinguishes particular goods and services from those of competitors. There are many advantages of registering a trademark, such as the period of protection given by registration is potentially unlimited and the scope of protection is equivalent to an exclusive right to use the mark in trade for most commercial purposes permitted by the particular registration. Furthermore, it is much quicker, cheaper and less uncertain to sue for infringement of a trademark rather than trying to rely on a passing-off action.

Who can find themselves responsible for infringement?

Trademarks are infringed by use in the course of trade of the same mark on identical goods; infringement also arises through use of a similar mark on the same goods, or the same mark on similar goods. Trademarks traditionally took the form of distinctive words or graphical devices, but more recently their definition has broadened to include shapes and combinations of colours.

Other legal implications

It is fair to state that a global online marketplace for designs will encourage increased competition amongst the designers of goods. However, the problem that comes with this is the potential for anti-competitive behaviour.

Another major legal problem raised by 3D printing is that it allows consumers and businesses to produce products without consideration of governing standards, such as toy safety regulations. Moreover, the ability to print objects on demand away from external control, may lead to mass production of illegal or restricted goods such as handguns, or other weapons and banned substances.

If you would like more information, or you feel that you have a strong claim that you would like to pursue, please get in contact with Jamil Ahmud or Nisha Chopra  on 0207 998 7777.

Intellectual Property